logo logo
 
 
logo Home  |  Store  |  Products  |  Training Center  |  Customer Center  |  About Us   |  International   

Response to Intervention

 Renaissance Tools
 for RTI
 
 Tiered Delivery Model
blue dot  STAR and CBMs
blue dot  Panel of Experts
blue dot  Key RTI Reports
 RTI Videos
 U.S. DOE Accolades
 RTI Is Hard—
 We Can Help
 
 Learn More

STAR Assessments and CBMs

The goal of RTI is not to use CBMs—rather, it is to generate high-quality data and use it to guide important educational decisions. Renaissance Learning’s STAR Early Literacy, STAR Reading, and STAR Math generate a broad range of information using less teacher time, providing more thorough and detailed data to guide important instructional decisions.

*Gersten, Compton, et al - 2008.

Value graph

The figures depicted above reflect the direct costs of purchasing the assessment, the teacher's time to administer and score the individual tests if required, ongoing cost of resources if required, and the assumption of three administrations per student per year.

Source: Laurits R. Christensen Associates (2010) independent study of assessment costs.

Advantages of CAT/IRT Assessments
The computer-based STAR Assessments incorporate two powerful advantages: computer-adaptive testing (CAT) and item response theory (IRT), allowing them to provide:

  • Time efficiency in quick administration
  • Valid and reliable results for students substantially below (or above) grade-level expectations, and for comparing scores across years
  • Richer data for informing instruction
  • Ready access to data through online databases
  • Multiple functions in a single assessment (screening, progress monitoring, diagnostic use)
Shortcomings of CBMs
  • Psychometric concerns with regard to predictivity (Gersten et al., 2008), growth measurement (Betts, Pickart, & Heistad, 2009; Francis et al., 2008, Christ & Ardoin, 2009), lack of a common scale of measurement, and variation in test administration and scoring, contributing to standard error.
  • Inefficiency and cost of administration, in terms of teacher time and time lost from instruction (Laurits R. Christensen Associates, 2010).
  • Lack of data to drive instruction. CBMs may indicate there is a problem but provide little or no information as to what to do about it (Burns, Dean, & Klar, 2004).
References

  © 2012  Renaissance Learning. All rights reserved.

Questions? Call: (800) 338-4204